For police force, online monitoring tools can be a powerful pressure: They can capture forensic evidence; permit real-time monitoring of events; and help distinguish suspects. But the public must be fully smart about government use of these technologies. And when they can be used, these tools should be strictly limited in their scope and length of time.
Visible cameras are a crime deterrent: In areas where they are located, crimes are often reduced. And when police can easily identify the faces of suspects, it can make it less complicated for them to get yourself a conviction.
Nevertheless for some people, these tools make them feel less safe and protected. They’re also worried about the chance that the government can be spying on them.
The NSA’s PRISM application monitors Internet data, which includes emails, text messages, speech and video chats, social networking activity plus more. PRISM is a perfect example of how tools go to website developed to get legitimate reasons can be misused and provide ends which is why they were not really intended.
Technology companies that sell mass surveillance accessories should improve to ensure they will aren’t allowing dictatorships and other countries to track dissidents and persecute minorities. EFF is fighting lawsuits against Cisco Systems and also other companies pertaining to supplying tools to China, where they have been used to track or arrest real human rights activists.
The FBI and Team of Homeland Security have been using they to target Dark-colored Lives Subject protestors and others speaking out on concerns like ethnicity justice plus the treatment of foreign nationals, justifying this by citing the specious category of “black identity extremism. ” These kinds of courses must come under higher oversight, and government agencies that use these tools must be held responsible when they break civil liberties.